Home
entries friends calendar user info
drew4096

Advertisement

Add to Memories
Tell a Friend
A bit of background on these:



I was curious as to just how efficient cars are, and how much energy
is actually takes at the wheels to move them. The energy in
hydrocarbons is easy to look up; but what about the drag forces?



It occurred to me that since drag is simply the force that must be
balanced to keep up ones speed, and speed is acceleration integrated over
time, that it should be possible to find out what I want to know by taking
a tape recorder out on the road and finding a straight, level portion, then
bring the car up to speed and put it in neutral, calling off speeds into
the recorder. Thus I got plots of speed versus time, the derivative of
which of course is acceleration. Given that plus the mass of the car, at
that time available on the registration, I got numbers for drag, and hence
required power, and energy per mile.



I did these tests first on a '77 Impala, then on a Monte
Carlo
, the figures for which I remember as 25 kW and 17 kW respectively
to maintain 60 miles per hour. I no longer have the data for these vehicles;
but I do for others that I've tested. When I asked a regular poster at
grex to run such a test on his
car, it occurred to me that I should also do the same. So I did, and posted
the results there.



By the time I got my latest vehicle, I'd had for a while a small digital
video camera, which makes it relatively easy to get a continuous timed
record of the speed gauge.



And so, here are the test results:




Windstar class minivan

Test conducted 2007:05:20; temperature 63 degrees F, barometric pressure
30 inches of mercury, for an air density of 1.219 kg/m3.
Intellicast
reported wind from the north at 11 MPH, which I judged small enough compared
to the test speed range, or at least as light as it usually gets.



Beforehand I had determined that the speedometer and odometer both
read about 15% short. The other vehicles that I tested had accurate gauges.



The highway in the test location runs along course 71 degrees (ENE) and
251 degrees (WSW). For this test I managed to get data for each direction.


Mass
Curb mass 3711.4 lb
Fuel 75
Self 150
Misc 50

Total: 3936.4 lb

Polynomial approximation: V = sum( Ak t^k ); a = sum( k Ak t^k )

East-Northeast run:
Speed Speed Time Poly Accel Accel Drag Power kW*hr
(MPH, raw) (correct) (sec) calc (MPH/sec) (grav) (lbf) (W) /mile
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
77.5 89.13 16.0 88.82 -1.577 -0.0719 282.99 49985 0.56274
75 86.25 18.0 85.72 -1.521 -0.0694 273.01 46539 0.54289
70 80.50 21.4 80.71 -1.427 -0.0650 256.04 41094 0.50914
65 74.75 25.4 75.23 -1.316 -0.0600 236.06 35313 0.46942
60 69.00 29.6 69.95 -1.199 -0.0546 215.09 29917 0.42771
55 63.25 35.5 63.36 -1.034 -0.0472 185.62 23387 0.36910
50 57.50 42.7 56.63 -0.834 -0.0380 149.64 16852 0.29756
45 51.75 50.3 51.10 -0.622 -0.0284 111.65 11345 0.22202
40 46.00 59.4 46.59 -0.369 -0.0168 66.14 6128 0.13153

West-Southwest run:
Speed Speed Time Poly Accel Accel Drag Power kW*hr
(MPH, raw) (correct) (sec) calc (MPH/sec) (grav) (lbf) (W) /mile
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
76.5 87.98 14.5 87.78 -1.381 -0.0630 247.80 43255 0.49276
75 86.25 16.0 85.74 -1.348 -0.0614 241.89 41238 0.48100
70 80.50 19.8 80.77 -1.264 -0.0576 226.90 36443 0.45119
65 74.75 24.6 74.96 -1.159 -0.0528 207.96 30997 0.41354
60 69.00 29.2 69.86 -1.058 -0.0482 189.81 26367 0.37744
55 63.25 35.8 63.35 -0.913 -0.0416 163.76 20631 0.32564
50 57.50 43.5 56.98 -0.743 -0.0339 133.36 15110 0.26518
45 51.75 52.8 51.02 -0.538 -0.0245 96.62 9803 0.19213
40 46.00 63.5 46.52 -0.303 -0.0138 54.34 5026 0.10805

I don't have figures for actual fuel economy yet - getting them requires
filling the tank - twice. The behavior of the fuel gauge suggests
a rate of about 19 MPG on surface streets and maybe 25 MPG on
nonstop highways. I plan to get better instrumentation at some point.



25 MPG at 75 MPH is 3 gallons per hour, or about 100 kW. 20 MPG would be
3.75 gallons per hour, or about 130 kW. This implies a total drivetrain
efficiency ranging from 23% to 31%. While still not exactly stellar
(the ideal for a 9:1 compression ratio air standard otto cycle is 58.5%),
it's significantly better than those of the Escort and Grand Am.




Other vehicle test results


Escort Wagon

Mass (curb): autos.msn.com/Vip/Specifications.aspx?modelid=1064&src=vip
2513 lb
Crew and
cargo: 160 lb approx
Fuel: 60 lb approx

Total: 2733 lb

Speed Time Poly Accel Accel Drag Power kW*hr
(MPH) (sec) calc (MPH/sec) (grav) (lbf) (W) /mile
------------------------------------------------------------------------
80 7.87 79.76637 -1.15239 -0.05253 143.6 22954 0.287
75 11.7 75.43812 -1.10717 -0.05047 137.9 20675 0.276
70 16.8 69.95688 -1.04123 -0.04746 129.7 18148 0.259
65 22 64.73187 -0.96724 -0.04409 120.5 15654 0.241
60 27.2 59.90930 -0.88644 -0.04040 110.4 13243 0.221
55 32.7 55.28575 -0.79357 -0.03617 98.9 10867 0.198
50 40.1 49.91168 -0.65658 -0.02993 81.8 8174 0.163

Fuel economy: 25 MPG (at 75 MPH, 3 GPH = 100 kW.)

Efficiency: 20% to 21%





Safari Wagon:

Mass (curb): carpoint.msn.com/Vip/Overview/Pontiac/Safari/1988.asp
4182 lb
Crew and
cargo: 150 lb approx
Fuel: 30 lb approx

Total: 4362 lb

Speed Time Poly Accel Accel Drag Power kW*hr
(MPH) (sec) calc (MPH/sec) (grav) (lbf) (W) /mile
------------------------------------------------------------------------
85 3.7 85.25442 -1.42615 -0.06501 283.6 48174 0.567
80 8.1 79.40030 -1.23836 -0.05645 246.2 39370 0.492
74 12.5 74.32544 -1.07195 -0.04886 213.2 31523 0.426
70 16.8 70.02861 -0.92997 -0.04239 184.9 25870 0.370
65 22.7 65.03736 -0.76838 -0.03502 152.8 19848 0.305
60 30 59.99955 -0.62164 -0.02833 123.6 14822 0.247
55 39 54.92147 -0.52172 -0.02378 103.7 11403 0.207
50 48.6 50.03282 -0.51370 -0.02341 102.1 10207 0.204

Fuel economy: 13 MPG (at 75 MPH, 5.8 GPH = 192 kW.)

Efficiency: 16% to 17%





Grand Am:

Mass (curb): carpoint.msn.com/Vip/Specifications/Pontiac/Grand%20Am/1993
2756 lb
Crew and
cargo: 150 lb approx
Fuel: 45 lb approx

Total: 2951 lb

Speed Time Poly Accel Accel Drag Power kW*hr
(MPH) (sec) calc (MPH/sec) (grav) (lbf) (W) /mile
------------------------------------------------------------------------
80 7.6 80.00630 -0.86589 -0.03947 116.5 18624 0.233
75 13.6 75.07199 -0.78044 -0.03557 105.0 15736 0.210
70 20.8 69.78537 -0.69032 -0.03146 92.9 12991 0.186
65 28 65.09877 -0.61376 -0.02797 82.6 10726 0.165
60 36.6 60.15105 -0.54008 -0.02462 72.7 8712 0.145
55 47.1 54.83992 -0.47636 -0.02171 64.1 7044 0.128
50 57.6 50.04656 -0.44146 -0.02012 59.4 5934 0.119

Fuel economy: 30 MPG (at 75 MPH, 2.5 GPH = 83 kW.)

Efficiency: 18% to 19%




Tags: ,

profile
drew4096
User: [info]drew4096
Name: drew4096
calendar
Back May 2007
12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031
page summary
tags

Advertisement

Customize